⏰ Welcome, Guest! You are viewing only 2 out of 27 total forums. Register today to view more, then Subscribe to view all forums, submit posts, reply to posts, create new threads, view photos, access private messages, change your avatar, create a photo album, customize your profile, and possibly be selected as our next Feature of the Month.
Sunny, you might also consider lustrasilk cholesterol. I had been thinking all this time that I was using LeKair but when I looked at my jar, I saw it was Lustrasilk. I think it works pretty well. I have no intentions of switching and the price is cheap, too!
I've used the queen helene before and I like the lustrasilk better. There's also a lekair thread somewhere...
I love lekair soooo much better than queen helene. the queen helene is not as (can't think of a word) conditioner like as lekair.... it was hard for me to get queen helene out of my hair it's worse than grease in my opinion.... but i love lekair, i use it to deep condition. i guess queen helene would be good to use if you were applying a touch up on your new growth, you could put that stuff on your old growth to prevent overlapping but that's all i think it's good for...
Queen helene cholesterol is the BOMB. It really moisturises my hair. On the other hand, Lekair dries out my hair when I wash it out and leaves it tangled.
[ QUOTE ]
Queen helene cholesterol is the BOMB. It really moisturises my hair. On the other hand, Lekair dries out my hair when I wash it out and leaves it tangled.
[/ QUOTE ]
My experience with both was the exact opposite! The good news is that they are so cheap you can try them both w/o breaking the bank.
I have had very good results with both. The Queen Helene's works great even if you don't add the water to make it foam. but if you do add water I recommend using a little heat with it.