snoop
Well-Known Member
So I read the following article earlier this summer and immediately thought about the infighting between influencers/others vs stylists that has gone on over the past few years: Why Are People Fighting About At-Home Gel Nail Kits on TikTok?
So it seems as though there were/are similar in-fighting between the professionals and the home/DIYers. In this case, I find it interesting that the industry is saying it's just nails...these guys can manage to do it at home...buy our product. I guess the same thing happened with hair in that you can buy a lot of supposed "salon quality" products without a license.
So I beg to question: Is it really that serious? I've always taken the position that hair "health" is a bit of a gimmick. In my ignorance, I'm not sure that there are any MDs or other doctors that are concerned about hair health in the way that stylists try to push it. As in, no one is going to med school to learn about split ends, how to colour and relax hair in a way that isn't damaging, how much hair to cut off to make it "healthier", which protein treatments provide better elasticity, etc.
A lot of what people talk about as hair "health" can't even be seen with a naked eye... worse yet, via a photograph. Even just touching hair isn't enough of a test.
So my question is: How much of hair "health" is a gimmick? How much of stylists know best is a sales tactic?
The biggest online beauty discourse of the past two weeks may be known on TikTok as mere “OPI nail drama,” but it’s brought about some pretty philosophical questions about the nail industry. Is it fair for nail technicians to charge upwards of $150 for a set? Is it OK for an untrained person to do their own gel nail polish or extensions at home? What’s worth risking for a free manicure? I’m sorry to say that not all of these questions have definitive answers—but I’m glad we’re talking about it for that exact reason.
So it seems as though there were/are similar in-fighting between the professionals and the home/DIYers. In this case, I find it interesting that the industry is saying it's just nails...these guys can manage to do it at home...buy our product. I guess the same thing happened with hair in that you can buy a lot of supposed "salon quality" products without a license.
So I beg to question: Is it really that serious? I've always taken the position that hair "health" is a bit of a gimmick. In my ignorance, I'm not sure that there are any MDs or other doctors that are concerned about hair health in the way that stylists try to push it. As in, no one is going to med school to learn about split ends, how to colour and relax hair in a way that isn't damaging, how much hair to cut off to make it "healthier", which protein treatments provide better elasticity, etc.
A lot of what people talk about as hair "health" can't even be seen with a naked eye... worse yet, via a photograph. Even just touching hair isn't enough of a test.
So my question is: How much of hair "health" is a gimmick? How much of stylists know best is a sales tactic?