SleekandBouncy
Well-Known Member
I've been told that lye is gentler on the hair, but harsher on the scalp, hence the burning.
My question is this, if it's harsher on the scalp doesn't that risk the long term health of your hair? If you scalp is damaged, can't that stunt growth since hair grows on the scalp?
Will the long term use of a lye relaxer even on a based scalp eventually lead to damaged or shocked hair follicles and doesn't the burning suggest it's hurting the scalp more than the no lye?
Any feedback would be appreciated. My mother and I have long contemplated trying lye again (my last attempt yrs ago resulted in underprocessed hair).
My question is this, if it's harsher on the scalp doesn't that risk the long term health of your hair? If you scalp is damaged, can't that stunt growth since hair grows on the scalp?
Will the long term use of a lye relaxer even on a based scalp eventually lead to damaged or shocked hair follicles and doesn't the burning suggest it's hurting the scalp more than the no lye?
Any feedback would be appreciated. My mother and I have long contemplated trying lye again (my last attempt yrs ago resulted in underprocessed hair).

.
) So it does what lye relaxers do, but takes out that whole "I can't close the cuticle after I leave" issue that calcium hydroxide relaxers have. And it doesn't leave calcium deposits on the hair shaft.
That is not their job. Their only purpose is to lift, swell, and open them. The products after the relaxer do the closing. No lye relaxers also are formulated at lower pHs than lye relaxers to appeal to the consumer market. There is more room for error with them (but obviously any error is gonna be a dangerous one). Jane Q. Public probably should not apply lye relaxers which is why they are considered "professional use only" formulas.